PUBLIC RESEARCH DOSSIER · PAC

Fight for Nebraska PAC

2 published research records · Latest research 2026-09-16

LIVING DOSSIER

About Fight for Nebraska PAC

Nebraska Public Media reported that Fight for Nebraska PAC, which supported Powell and opposed a primary rival, received major funding from Way Back PAC and smaller funding from Western Futures Fund and Global Impact.

From Nebraska disclosure shows one consultant worked for Sixteen Thirty, New Venture and WFF before receiving Way Back campaign support (2026-09-16). Recorded status: Primary House disclosure verifies consulting for Sixteen Thirty, New Venture and WFF; FEC-derived records verify later Way Back candidate support. Causation/control not established. New published findings are added here as sourced excerpts.

Recent sourced additions

Newer published records appear here as excerpts. Their recorded status and qualifications remain attached to the full source record.

Fight for Nebraska PAC's Apr.
WFF directly furnished in-kind polling to Fight for Nebraska, strengthening the Way Back $75K research-services reconstruction · 2026-09-16
Recorded status: PRIMARY FEC VERIFIED comparator: Fight for Nebraska reported WFF $100K cash + $12,522 in-kind polling in March 2026. This supports the plausibility of the Way Back $75K research-services reconstruction but does not replace the missing raw Way Back row.

FOLLOW THE RECORD

Connections

Specific connections are being assembled from the published research. A shared mention is not enough to establish a relationship.

Other names appearing in the same research (10)

These are research overlaps for discovery, not documented relationships. Read the underlying records before drawing conclusions.

People

Denise Powell · 1 shared record

PACs

Way Back PAC · 2 shared records

Organizations

Western Futures Fund · 2 shared records
1861 Initiative · 1 shared record
Global Impact · 1 shared record
New Venture Fund · 1 shared record
She's Electable · 1 shared record
She's Electable LLC · 1 shared record
Sixteen Thirty Fund · 1 shared record
The 1861 Initiative · 1 shared record

See Fight for Nebraska PAC's research network →

SOURCED RECORD

Research & sources

These dated records accumulate as research is published. Each retains its original status, context, and source references.

Connection research · 2026-09-16Nebraska disclosure shows one consultant worked for Sixteen Thirty, New Venture and WFF before receiving Way Back campaign support

Recorded status: Primary House disclosure verifies consulting for Sixteen Thirty, New Venture and WFF; FEC-derived records verify later Way Back candidate support. Causation/control not established.

A primary U.S. House financial disclosure provides a concrete example of personnel overlap across the same national funding architecture now being traced into Idaho. Nebraska congressional candidate Denise Powell's Aug. 13, 2025 candidate financial disclosure lists compensation in excess of $5,000 from each of Sixteen Thirty Fund, New Venture Fund and Western Futures Fund for consulting, along with multiple Nebraska advocacy/campaign clients. The disclosure also identifies her as a partner in She's Electable LLC. Separately, current FEC-derived records show Way Back PAC contributed $10,000 to Powell's federal campaign in the 2026 cycle. Nebraska Public Media reported that Fight for Nebraska PAC, which supported Powell and opposed a primary rival, received major funding from Way Back PAC and smaller funding from Western Futures Fund and Global Impact. WFF's own grant history separately reports a $12,000 2022 grant to an entity listed as 'She's Electable,' but the available records do not yet establish that this recipient is legally identical to Powell's She's Electable LLC and the entities must not be merged without an EIN/address match. The verified takeaway is narrower: the Sixteen Thirty/New Venture/WFF ecosystem can share professional consultants, and a consultant disclosed as working for all three later became a federal candidate supported directly by Way Back and indirectly by a Way Back/WFF-funded super PAC. This is a non-Idaho operational example useful for understanding network behavior; it does NOT establish quid pro quo, candidate control, that consulting work caused later political support, or that the same pattern necessarily applies to Idaho.

This dossier reflects published research, including its uncertainties. Inclusion or association alone does not establish wrongdoing. Submit a correction or additional evidence →